Policies & templates

Guidelines, SOPs & templates

Everything you need to prepare a sound submission: downloadable templates, standard operating procedures, role permissions, and the correspondence policy.

Downloadable templates

Start from the right template


PDF

Human protocol form

IRB study structure & requirements.

Download ↓
PDF

Animal protocol form

IACUC protocol & 3Rs justification.

Download ↓
DOCX

Informed consent form

Participant consent (AR/EN).

Download ↓
DOCX

PI declaration

Signed responsibility & compliance.

Download ↓
PDF

Adverse-event report

For use during continuing review.

Download ↓
PDF

Amendment / renewal

Modify or extend an approval.

Download ↓

Note: the template links above are placeholders — wire them to your final files when ready.

Standard operating procedures

How the committee operates


  • SOP-01

    Submission intake & screening

    Completeness checks, panel routing, clock-pause rules.

  • SOP-02

    Reviewer assignment & COI

    Conflict flagging, reviewer blinding, recusal.

  • SOP-03

    Meetings & quorum

    Domain-specific quorum and minute-taking.

  • SOP-04

    Decisions & certificates

    Letterheads, decision letters, certificate issuance.

  • SOP-05

    Continuing review & inspection

    Reminders, amendments, semi-annual facility inspection.

  • SOP-06

    Archiving & audit log

    Read-only retention and action-log integrity.

Platform architecture

Fast static public pages, plus a secured portal with a database, authentication, and access-controlled file storage. HTTPS is enforced, uploads sit in restricted buckets, and an immutable audit log records every action.

rec-pck.orgHTTPS onlyDomain gate: @atu.edu.iqAudit logAccess-controlled storage

Core principle

Auditability is the core requirement of any ethics system: who did what, and when.

Permissions

Role-based access


RoleAccess rights
Submitter (ATU only)Create/edit own applications before submission, upload files, view own status, respond to revisions, download own approvals; no access to others' applications
REC SecretaryView all applications, screen completeness, route to panels, manage calendars and reminders, issue letters/certificates, manage archive; cannot vote
Panel CoordinatorAll Secretary view rights for own panel, assign reviewers, manage meetings, record decisions for own panel
ReviewerView only assigned applications, submit checklist and recommendation; cannot see other reviewers' identities (blinded) until decision
Veterinarian / LaypersonSame as reviewer, but flagged as mandatory for their protocol type
REC Chair (Head)Full read access across both panels, override/arbitration rights, sign final approvals, view audit logs and reports
System AdministratorTechnical access: user management, domain-restriction settings, backups, audit-log integrity; no review or voting role
Correspondence

Email handling policy


A single authenticated address

All official correspondence (confirmations, decisions, certificates, reminders) is sent from one authenticated system address — no-reply@rec-pck.org — with rec.karbala@atu.edu.iq as the monitored reply-to for queries.

SPFDKIMDMARCno-reply@rec-pck.org

Not sent from users' mailboxes

Official committee mail is not sent from individual @atu.edu.iq mailboxes — that breaks the audit trail and can't be authenticated. Instead, every action is logged to the named user inside the system, and notifications are addressed to their verified inbox but sent from the rec-pck.org address.

Role-based aliases

Where a genuine need exists for direct correspondence, a coordinator or reviewer is given a role-based alias (e.g. irb.coordinator@rec-pck.org) rather than routing through a personal mailbox.